In Memory of …

 

Least we forget, …. these stones and wall are a reminder of where things have come from.

 

The scrolls and cornerstone are from our Lyttelton home.

The brick wall is from bricks taken from the brick building that was demolished at the back of the Red House.

The stones are from the foundations on the site.

 

The Canterbury Earthquakes are an undeniable truth.  They are the reason we are here. They are the reason these artifacts are gathered around our tree. They remind me of why I am here and what it took to get here.

 

IMG_8552

 

So, to some, this will be a pile of stones and bricks but for us it is a quiet reminder of ‘How and Why’

 

 

 

Advertisements

The Red House was the Red Project

How does it happen?

The Red project is now the Red House.

The Red House is real.

‘Real’, according to the wooden horse in ‘The Velveteen Rabbit’ is when you have had all your fur loved off.

Five years of loving has brought the red house back to life. Seven years after the earthquakes the former Cranmer Bridge club has a new life, as a photographic studio for Johannes van Kan and Jo Grams, as private accommodation, and as a home for their family

There is still work to be done.

But it is real.

 

 

IMG_8380

The Red House is made of wood

 

 

 

As I remove the layers of acrylics, oil paints, shelacs, varnishes, and calcium based paints, I am finding timber.  Beautiful timber….  And sometimes borer, not so beautiful.

The wood inspires me to bring it through to the grey house.

Between the two buildings there is a relationship.  They are connected.  The important Heritage principle is that the two buildings are unique to each other.  This stops confusion between Heritage and new.

The important Architectural principle is that they speak to each other.

The timber is their conversation.

And then we met Thomas.

Thomas is a connector.  He’s a problem solver. And he has access to solutions. He has family in the wood industry.  Family by blood, and family by association.

We now have a room full of Rimu floorboards for the lounge.  We have a large flitch of Matai being slowly stripped back to clean grain, after ten years on the West Coast, in the room next door.  We have Rimu sarking waiting to be collected.  It will clad some new walls.

When our home in Lyttelton came down we salvaged some beams that we will turn into stair treads. We hope we will have enough. A second hand dealer in Christchurch stole some from our Lyttelton section before we could get it into secure storage. (That is worse than having borer).

 

We recovered the front doors from Lyttelton, and will use those  in our foyer. We have other salvaged doors we will restore and use upstairs.

Is it too much wood?

No.

Will we end up with a log cabin?

No!

There is something about wood. It has resilience. It has a story.

I went to a talk about time travel. The interesting thing about time travel was that it really only became a concept through the writing of HG Wells at about the same time as the advent of Photography. With Photography people realised the ability to ‘freeze’ time. This was ‘real time’ and not the interpreted time of paintings and books. People were also able to return to a previous time by viewing images created in that moment.

With this notion of capturing a moment, came the idea of returning to that time. Trees are witness to the passage of time, and to a limited degree, record the nature of events. This makes them story tellers, or tomes.

Whether I am stripping away the layers of varnishes and paints, or sanding my way through years of weathering, working with wood leaves me feeling calm. Removing these outer layers brings back truths about the story of the building. It reveals changes that were disguised by paints,  and the truth about the way the building was made. There are many layers of time to be revealed.

The Red House has many types of timber. It gives me permission to be eclectic in my Grey House choices.

 

 

 

Jo is learning CAD

Some might not see sense in that. However in her new life as an Interior Designer (Check out Bitens and Grams) CAD is a necessary evil.

It means that we get to grow our design and every variation is on our own dime.

The learning part is huge, but the design is coming along to a point where we have a more affordable and realistic outcome.

Sadly we have had to let go of fancy notions of Basement dining cellars, Rooftop art studios, the deep and dark internal courtyard, Ida’s multi story bedroom, the rooftop outdoor kitchen, and the whiskey room. Very sadly indeed.

We have returned to the Warehouse apartment that we originally wanted.

So Jo is learning CAD. The worst part of that is that CAD doesn’t like Macs, and we don’t like PC’s. The standoff didn’t work and to my disgust we bought a PC. True to my expectations we had to return the first one for replacement because it had ‘issues’.

I hang my head in shame (about the PC).

 

All of a sudden

There came a time when the prospect of building made us depressed/angry/frustrated.

Provoked by the constant stream of expensive expert statements that contributed little to the actual build, we took a moment and questioned whether we were prepared to risk an unsustainable level of debt to build something that we had fallen out of love with.

We had invested heavily financially and emotionally.

We chose to STOP

We withdrew our consent application, and informed people of our decision.

We identified that we wanted to live in the city. Early morning coffees confirmed that.

We will build on our site.

Our original brief to both architects was that we weren’t worried about how it looked and that the fun stuff should happen on the inside. The first architect blew our budget by more than 50% just in the concept stage. Our brief to the second architect asked him to modify the design so that we could build something we could afford. Neither of those things happened.

We ended up with a whole new design and it was out of budget. We have to take responsibility for that because we let it happen. We would still recommend both architects.

 

We will build to the original shell, keeping it simple, elegant, and affordable. Apparently this is possible.

 

And we will put the fun stuff on the inside. We will reference our old place in Lyttelton.

We have been working on our floor plan. Things are looking up.

 

 

 

The advantages of owning a Heritage building

25 Armagh Street - a Heritage Project

25 Armagh Street
– a Heritage Project

1- The district plan says that Telecommunication utilities cannot be built within 20 meters of you.

2- Their stories are well documented.

3- People will always have an opinion about what you do (not always an advantage)

4- The building has its own story

5- You don’t have to choose colours …. somebody chose them for you when the place was built.

6- ‘They’ broke the rules before the rules were made.

7- Random people come and talk to you about their lives (not always an advantage)

 

Problems versus solutions

Today we lifted some floorboards.  Actually it was the builder.

We were looking for underfloor space for ventilation.

Didn’t find it!

Did find some very scary borer though – could argue that they contributed to ventilation … but probably not a convincing proposition.

A48Q9764

What to do? What to do? What to do?

We have a conundrum. Do we lift the floorboards, and dig in the mandatory clearance for access and ventilation? Or do we leave it as is?

The floorboards won’t survive the lift, the joists will need replacing, The digging would lower the soil to below the surrounding ground creating the potential for a lake under the building, the piles would need replacing, and the archeologists could stop everything if we find a broken plate. We would, however, get better ventilation and would be able to install insulation.

The Heritage people would prefer us to keep the status quo, because we get to preserve the original fabric of the building. Certainly the saving in time and money works for us.

Rather than open that can of (borer) worms we are inclined to agree with them.

In a way the borer is the solution.